Some people believe that we should replace all plastic products with more environmentally-friendly materials such as glass, while others think this is not realistic. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The environmental impact of plastic has sparked global concern, leading to debate over whether all plastic products should be replaced with eco-friendly alternatives like glass. While some argue in favour of complete replacement, others believe such a shift is impractical. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own view.

Supporters of replacement point out that plastic is non-biodegradable and persists in the environment for centuries, posing serious threats to wildlife and ecosystems. Switching to glass, which is non-toxic, fully recyclable, and reusable, could significantly reduce landfill waste and ocean pollution. In products like bottles, jars, and food containers, glass serves as a sustainable alternative that can help build a circular economy.

On the other hand, critics argue that replacing all plastic with glass is unrealistic. Glass is heavier, more fragile, and requires more energy to produce and transport. In critical sectors such as healthcare and technology, plastic is essential due to its flexibility, hygiene, and durability. For example, sterile plastic packaging and medical equipment are irreplaceable in hospitals. Additionally, a complete switch could increase production costs and have unintended environmental consequences, such as higher carbon emissions from glass manufacturing.

In my opinion, while reducing plastic use is crucial, replacing it entirely with glass is neither feasible nor always beneficial. A more balanced approach is needed—one that focuses on reducing unnecessary plastic, encouraging the use of reusable and biodegradable materials, and improving recycling infrastructure.